top of page

The purpose of this blog is to promote Christian theology and apologetics from a specifically presuppositional standpoint. It is my hope that people will find this site helpful as they seek to engage the culture of unbelief with Christian truth.
ā
As the title of this blog indicates (Revealed Apologetics), I believe that apologetics is a biblical command and hence a revealed command since it is found in what the Christian believes to be divine revelation (i.e. the scriptures).
Select a Topic

WHAT PEOPLE SAY
“Eli Ayala is not only one of the best among Christian apologists and debaters, but he has a heart for ministry. What I love about him is that his interest in Christian defense springs from a deeper interest in loving people and glorifying God.”
— Braxton Hunter










Does the God of the Bible Exist? Eli Ayala vs. Dan Barker
My Opening Statement Introduction In this series, Iāll be sharing the various portions of my debate with atheist Dan Barker, beginning with my opening statement. Before you read it, a brief word of context. Our opening statements were limited to ten minutes. As you know, ten minutes is not much time to unpack an argument of this magnitude. Each of the points I raised could have been developed in far greater detail. My strategy was to present the overarching framework of my ca
revealedapologetic
Feb 126 min read
Ā


The God of the Watchtower: An Imperfect Savior
Transcribed from a talk I gave on the topic. Edited by Chatgpt. My name is Elias Ayala . I am the founder of Revealed Apologetics , a Christian apologetics ministry that exists to help equip Christians to defend the faith. My work typically focuses on issues of apologetic methodology, Reformed theology, and broader questions in Christian philosophy. Over the years, Iāve had the opportunity to engage a wide range of topics and to interview a variety of guests and experts in th
revealedapologetic
Jan 176 min read
Ā


Can Skeptics Justify their Foundations?
An Analysis and Commentary on My Live Exchange with a Skeptic Near the end of a recent livestream, I had an exchange with an atheist caller that nicely illustrates a recurring problem in apologetic conversations. The discussion touched on sense perception, logic, causation, and induction, but the real issue was deeper than any one of those topics. The central question was this: can the skeptic justify the foundational beliefs he is already using in order to argue at all? Th
revealedapologetic
Dec 30, 20258 min read
Ā


Are Multiple Logical Systems a Problem for TAG?
One of the things I love about doing online apologeticsāwhether on YouTube, in debates, or right here on this blogāis interacting with...
revealedapologetic
Jun 5, 20255 min read
Ā


In Defense of Life
By: Eli Ayala Introduction When engaging in discussions about the morality of abortion, itās important to be equipped with clear and...
revealedapologetic
Aug 8, 20244 min read
Ā


Answers to Practical Presup Questions
Q:Ā What is presuppositional apologetics? A:Ā Many people ask me this question, and it's not always easy to explain complex ideas in simple...
revealedapologetic
Apr 21, 20247 min read
Ā


Foundationalism & Circularity
Can Foundationalism avoid the fallacy of circularity? Thatās a very good question. Before we can answer that question, we need to...
revealedapologetic
Dec 2, 20235 min read
Ā


Presup's Big Idea
Christians newly exposed to Cornelius Van Tilās way of defending the Christian faith may be undoubtedly overwhelmed with the complexity...
revealedapologetic
Dec 2, 20234 min read
Ā


Presuppositional Dialogue with a Jehovahās Witness
By Eli Ayala Introduction In a previous article I wrote in which I sought to present a basic outline for engaging the Jehovahās Witnesses...
revealedapologetic
Aug 14, 20235 min read
Ā
bottom of page